Michaël Borremans. Photo: Alex Salinas
Michaël Borremans: The Acrobat
David Zwirner is pleased to announce The Acrobat, an exhibition of new paintings by Michaël Borremans (b. 1963), taking place at the gallery’s 525 West 19th Street location in New York. This will be the artist’s seventh solo exhibition with the gallery and his first in New York since 2011.
Many of Borremans’s new works are realized on an intimate scale that draws the viewer into them. This play with scale is further explored through their featured imagery: enigmatic scenes of groups of figures looking at what appear to be rectangular, sealed display cases. Depicted from an elevated vantage point, the characters and settings seem staged, as though they are miniature models rather than real figures. These scenes are presented alongside portraits that both honor and subvert the historical associations of the genre. In this recent body of work, Borremans continues to explore surface and artifice in his careful consideration of mise-en-scène, combining technical mastery with subject matter that defies straightforward interpretation.
Image: Michaël Borremans, The Double, 2022 (detail)
"[The Acrobat] provides an opportunity...to see the genius of Borremans in the flesh. He renders skin with such intensity that the living, breathing, blood-coursing nature of the human being becomes vividly alive."
—John Vincler, The New York Times
“To describe Borremans’s masterworks, a riff on Jan van Eyck is gorgeously unoriginal. Borremans anticipates the lineage in which critics and historians will place him, then sends those comparisons down a rabbit hole. In a neat model of the evolution of art, Borremans’s work is a mutant in a five-piece suit: an evasive omnivore that devours van Eyck with as much pleasure as it does Man Ray, Luis Buñuel, and Francis Bacon.” —Katya Tylevich
Unless otherwise noted, texts throughout are excerpted from Tylevich’s catalogue essay in the forthcoming David Zwirner Books publication Michaël Borremans: The Acrobat, 2022.
Michaël Borremans, Five Writers (Design for a Sculpture), 2021 (detail)
“It is the vitrine, and not the human, that is the recurring character across The Acrobat’s landscape paintings, which really aren’t landscapes.… The Acrobat’s concepts are related to Rosa (2017), a large-scale sculpture in the snowy mountains of Gstaad, Switzerland, that depicts a hooded human figure … planted headfirst in the snow, bare feet bowing above the bystander.”
“Notice the distance at which the onlookers gaze at the vitrines, as if the contents might tumble out and crush them. Yes, these are paintings made across two years of a global pandemic, and an allegory of isolation leaps out in a puff of confetti. Then again, Borremans’s works have always cautioned against standing too close.”
Michaël Borremans, Milk (or The Acrobat) (Design for a Sculpture), 2021 (detail)
“At first you expect a narrative, because the figures are familiar. But then you see that some parts of the paintings don’t match, or don’t make sense … the work switches between an aspect of the absurd and a romantic connotation.”
—Michaël Borremans
Installation view, Michaël Borremans: The Acrobat, New York, 2022
“The Acrobat’s (so-called) portraits initially register as cohesive and sane, anchored by familiar symbols, such as the human face and torso, and the tranquilized postures of religious icons.…
Like the paintings themselves, the titles are a hazy amalgam of the present (pilot) and timeless (witch), fantastical and ordinary, dangerous and funny, charmed and cursed. These references all dwell in the same enchanted forest, declaring neutrality.”
Michaël Borremans, The Apprentice, 2022 (detail)
Michaël Borremans, The Double, 2022 (detail)
“Of the ‘portraits,’ The Witch (2022) is the most obvious visual misfit.… He is the most terrestrial of the characters, average in his build and trappings, but he carries the most otherworldly designation. The painting mummifies him in a pose reminiscent of a patron saint.”
“When Kazimir Malevich, in the 1930s, abandoned abstractionism under duress and made figurative portraits, including a self-portrait, he cast some figures in similarly pious poses. These later works are commonly interpreted unironically, as an about-face from abstraction to representation.”
“It is unlikely that Borremans is directly quoting Malevich, but his work is so exhilaratingly permeable that disparate references easily pass through and live within it comfortably. The artist revels in unexpected interpretations. (Malevich, by the way, also painted faceless, masked, and hooded figures.)”
Installation view, Michaël Borremans: The Acrobat, New York, 2022
“For the person who breezes past titles, ignores museum didactics, and sees a collection of images as purely visual, it is reasonable to understand The Acrobat as portraits of automatons in the off mode.… The artist’s expressionistic deepfake is his subjective, sensitive ability to depict human life while simultaneously suggesting the absence of a beating heart.”
Michaël Borremans, The Pilot, 2021 (detail)
Michaël Borremans, The Acrobat, 2021 (detail)
“The temperament in this body of work is something different. It is nervous. Borremans says that in comparison to his other works, ‘The Acrobat has a different psychological depth.’”
Michaël Borremans, The Racer, 2022 (detail)
“[Painting] is a historically charged medium. I wanted to use that weight of history in my work.… It’s like a hammer: you can replace the material of a hammer with modern technology but the function stays ever the same. Painting is highly rudimentary; it has always existed and always will.”
—Michaël Borremans
Installation view, Michaël Borremans: The Acrobat, New York, 2022
Michaël Borremans: The Acrobat
Accompanying the exhibition is a new David Zwirner Books publication with text by Katya Tylevich, excerpted throughout this page.
Order Now
Inquire about works by Michaël Borremans